Exploration Research
Introduction
“Matriarchy” and “patriarchy” are often used as simplified labels to describe systems of gendered authority, yet these terms represent complex and historically evolving social structures shaped over tens of thousands of years through ecology, kinship, and cultural knowledge. Matriarchal systems generally centre women—particularly elder women—in domains of kinship, cultural transmission, and social organisation, while patriarchal systems prioritise male authority in governance, property ownership, lineage, and institutional power (Saini 2024; Lerner 1986). While these definitions provide a useful starting point, they risk reducing the diversity of human social organisation into a binary that does not accurately reflect how societies have functioned across deep time.
For most of human history, societies did not conform strictly to either matriarchal or patriarchal structures. Instead, they developed relational systems of authority grounded in interdependence, reciprocity, and environmental knowledge. Indigenous societies across Victoria exemplify this complexity, operating through kinship-based systems that balanced roles and responsibilities across genders rather than privileging one over another. Authority was embedded in Country, cultural practice, and relational obligations, rather than concentrated in hierarchical power structures .
This article expands on these foundations by tracing the deep time origins of gendered authority, examining how matrifocal and patriarchal systems emerged, and situating Indigenous Victorian knowledge within a broader global context. In doing so, it challenges assumptions about the universality of patriarchy and highlights alternative models of governance grounded in balance, care, and connection to Country.
Deep Time Origins of Gendered Authority
To understand matriarchal and patriarchal systems, it is necessary to move beyond recent historical frameworks and consider the conditions under which early human societies developed. For over 100,000 years, humans lived in small, mobile groups structured around kinship, cooperation, and ecological knowledge. These societies relied on collective survival strategies rather than rigid hierarchies, and authority was typically distributed among elders and knowledge holders.
Anthropological and evolutionary research suggests that women played a central role in sustaining these societies through gathering plant foods, processing resources, and maintaining detailed knowledge of seasonal cycles and ecosystems. In many cases, these contributions provided the majority of daily caloric intake (Hrdy 2009). Men contributed through hunting, tool-making, and protection, particularly in environments where large game was available. These roles were complementary, forming an interdependent system in which survival depended on cooperation rather than dominance (Graeber & Wengrow 2021).
Elders, regardless of gender, held authority through knowledge and experience. Elder women, in particular, were central to the transmission of cultural knowledge, child-rearing practices, and ecological understanding. Their roles in maintaining continuity across generations positioned them as key figures in social organisation. Authority in this context was not institutionalised but relational, emerging through responsibility, care, and the ability to sustain the group.
Rather than fitting within the categories of matriarchy or patriarchy, these societies can be understood as relational systems of authority. Power was not concentrated in a single group but distributed across different roles, each carrying its own form of influence. This challenges the assumption that hierarchical gender dominance is an inherent feature of human societies and instead suggests that such structures emerged later under specific historical conditions.
The Development of Matrifocal and Matrilineal Systems
As some human groups transitioned toward more settled forms of life during the late Paleolithic and early Neolithic periods, new forms of social organisation began to take shape. In certain contexts, this led to the development of matrifocal and matrilineal systems, where descent and inheritance were traced through the mother’s line.
One of the primary factors contributing to this shift was the certainty of maternal lineage. In early societies, maternity was always observable, while paternity was not always clearly identifiable. This made maternal descent a stable basis for organising kinship and inheritance. Women, as the bearers of children, became central to the continuity of lineage and the maintenance of social cohesion.
In matrilineal systems, children typically remained within the mother’s kin group, and property, knowledge, and responsibilities were passed down through female lines. These systems did not necessarily position women as dominant rulers but rather as custodians of continuity and relational networks. Authority was exercised through influence, knowledge, and the ability to maintain cohesion within the group.
Examples of matrilineal or matrifocal systems can be found across the world, including the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, where Clan Mothers held the authority to appoint and remove chiefs, and contemporary societies such as the Minangkabau of Indonesia and the Mosuo of China. These examples demonstrate that matrifocal systems are not anomalies but enduring forms of social organisation that have persisted alongside other systems throughout history.
The Emergence of Patriarchal Systems
Patriarchal systems, as they are commonly understood today, emerged much later in human history and are closely associated with the development of agriculture, permanent settlements, and the accumulation of surplus resources. The transition to farming fundamentally altered the relationship between people and land, leading to the establishment of property ownership and the need to define inheritance and control.
As land became a source of wealth, systems of inheritance became more rigid, often favouring patrilineal descent (Lerner 1986). This shift was reinforced by increasing territorial conflict, which elevated male roles associated with warfare and defence. Over time, these dynamics became institutionalised through the development of early states, legal systems, and organised religions, many of which codified male authority and hierarchical power structures (Saini 2024).
The consolidation of patriarchal systems involved a shift from relational authority to hierarchical control. Power became concentrated in the hands of male leaders, and social organisation was structured around ownership, inheritance, and governance. This transformation did not occur uniformly across all societies but was shaped by specific environmental, economic, and political conditions.
Importantly, this historical perspective challenges the notion that patriarchy is a natural or inevitable feature of human society. Instead, it can be understood as a social system that emerged under particular circumstances and has been maintained through institutional and cultural reinforcement.
Indigenous Victoria: Relational Authority Beyond the Binary
Indigenous societies in Victoria provide a powerful example of social organisation that does not conform to the binary framework of matriarchy and patriarchy. As documented in historical and anthropological sources, kinship systems in this region were complex and multi-layered, incorporating both patrilineal clan affiliations and matrifocal elements in moiety structures, marriage rules, and cultural responsibilities (Clark 1990; Howitt 1904).
Central to these systems was the concept of relational authority, in which roles and responsibilities were defined by one’s position within the kinship network and one’s connection to Country. Authority was not concentrated in a single gender but distributed across different domains of knowledge and responsibility.
Women held significant authority in areas such as food systems, water management, medicinal practices, and the transmission of cultural knowledge. Elder women played a crucial role in maintaining the continuity of language, story, and ecological understanding, ensuring that knowledge was passed down through generations (Broome 2005). This authority was often expressed through practice rather than formal titles, reflecting a system in which leadership was embedded in everyday life.
The work of Gunditjmara weaver Aunty Connie Hart provides a clear example of this form of authority. By preserving and passing on eel-basket weaving traditions during periods of cultural suppression, she maintained not only a material practice but also the knowledge systems and relationships that underpin it (ABC News 2018). Such examples demonstrate how women’s roles functioned as forms of governance and resilience within Indigenous communities.
Men, in turn, held responsibilities in areas such as ceremony, hunting, and territorial knowledge. These roles were equally vital and interconnected with those of women, creating a system in which authority was distributed rather than hierarchical. This reflects a broader Indigenous worldview in which power is understood as responsibility to community, kinship, and Country.
Colonisation and the Imposition of Patriarchal Systems
The arrival of British colonisation in Victoria introduced a fundamentally different system of social organisation, one based on patriarchal legal frameworks, private property ownership, and hierarchical governance. These systems disrupted Indigenous kinship structures and undermined the authority of women, particularly in areas such as land management, ceremony, and community leadership (Broome 2005; NIT 2022).
Colonial institutions imposed European gender norms that often marginalised women’s roles and restricted their participation in cultural practices. Missions and government policies separated families, suppressed cultural knowledge, and dismantled Indigenous governance systems. These processes were not incidental but systematic, contributing to the erosion of relational authority structures that had existed for millennia.
Recent truth-telling processes, including the Yoorrook Justice Commission, have highlighted the extent of these impacts, documenting the ways in which colonial policies disrupted family structures, cultural authority, and community governance (The Guardian 2025a). Despite this, Indigenous communities have demonstrated remarkable resilience, with women continuing to play central roles in cultural revitalisation, community leadership, and political advocacy (Griffith Review 2022).
Global Comparisons Across Time
When viewed within a global context, the patterns observed in Indigenous Victoria align with broader trends in human social organisation. Early societies were predominantly structured around relational, kinship-based authority, while matrilineal systems emerged in various regions where women played central roles in lineage and social organisation.
The Haudenosaunee Confederacy provides a well-documented example of a system in which women held significant political authority through the role of Clan Mothers. Similarly, matrilineal systems in Indonesia, China, and India demonstrate the persistence of alternative forms of social organisation that challenge the dominance of patriarchal models.
At the same time, patriarchal systems became dominant in many parts of the world following the rise of agriculture, state formation, and organised religion. However, the continued existence of matrifocal and relational systems highlights the diversity of human social organisation and challenges the assumption that any single system is universal or inevitable.
Reframing Matriarchy and Patriarchy
A more nuanced understanding of matriarchal and patriarchal systems requires moving beyond simplistic definitions and recognising the historical and cultural contexts in which these systems developed. Matriarchal systems are often less about female dominance and more about maintaining balance, continuity, and relational responsibility. Patriarchal systems, by contrast, tend to emphasise control, ownership, and hierarchical power structures.
Indigenous systems in Victoria suggest a different model altogether—one in which authority is relational, distributed, and embedded in connection to Country. In this model, leadership is defined not by power over others but by responsibility to the community and the environment. This perspective offers valuable insights for rethinking contemporary systems of governance, particularly in the context of sustainability, social equity, and cultural renewal.
Conclusion
Across deep time, human societies have evolved through a range of social structures, from relational kinship systems to matrifocal and patriarchal forms of organisation. Indigenous societies in Victoria maintained systems that resisted rigid categorisation, embodying relational models of authority grounded in Country, kinship, and cultural responsibility.
Understanding these systems challenges the assumption that patriarchy is a universal or inevitable feature of human society and highlights the importance of recognising diverse forms of social organisation. By engaging with Indigenous knowledge systems, particularly the roles of women within them, it becomes possible to reimagine governance and leadership in ways that prioritise balance, care, and sustainability.
References
ABC News (2018) Act of rebellion as ‘naughty girl’ wove against oppression. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-07/act-of-rebellion-as-naughty-girl-wove-against-oppression/9943694
Berndt, R.M. & Berndt, C.H. (1979) Aboriginal Australia: A Cultural History. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
Broome, R. (2005) Aboriginal Victorians: A History Since 1800. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Clark, I.D. (1990) Aboriginal Languages and Clans: An Historical Atlas of Western and Central Victoria, 1800–1900. Melbourne: Monash University.
First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria (2023) Lisa Briggs. Available at: https://firstpeoplesvic.org/members/lisa-briggs/
Graeber, D. & Wengrow, D. (2021) The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. London: Allen Lane.
Griffith Review (2022) The power of the First Nations matriarchy. Available at: https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/the-power-of-the-first-nations-matriarchy/
Howitt, A.W. (1904) The Native Tribes of South-East Australia. London: Macmillan.
Hrdy, S.B. (2009) Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
IB News (2023) Celebrating young Indigenous leaders in Victoria. Available at: https://ibnews.com.au/celebrating-young-aboriginal-leaders-in-victoria/
Koorie Heritage Trust (2020) On Country: Stories of Gunditjmara Elders. Available at: https://kht.org.au/visit-us/collections/oral-visual-recordings/stories-of-gunditjmara-elders/
Lerner, G. (1986) The Creation of Patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Indigenous Times (NIT) (2022) Indigenous women hold their heads high for culture, Country and children. Available at: https://nit.com.au/
Saini, A. (2024) Patriarchy is not universal – it is a social experiment. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/08/international-womens-day-barbie-change-patriarchy
The Guardian (2024) Burnayi Lurnayi Bendigo development aims to provide safe homes for Indigenous women. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/nov/23/burnayi-lurnayi-bendigo-development-aims-to-provide-safe-homes-for-aboriginal-women
The Guardian (2025a) Victoria’s Indigenous people experienced genocide, truth-telling inquiry says. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jul/01/victorias-indigenous-people-experienced-genocide-truth-telling-inquiry-says
The Guardian (2025b) Walk for Truth: hundreds join 486km trek for reconciliation. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jun/18/walk-for-truth-hundreds-of-people-join-486km-trek-from-portland-to-melbourne-for-reconciliation
Times of India (2024) Çatalhöyük: 9,000-year-old city ruled by women? Available at: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Unearth Women (2021) Matriarchal societies where women are in charge. Available at: https://www.unearthwomen.com
Written, Researched and Directed by James Vegter 16/09/2025
MLA Educational Articles
Sharing the truth of Indigenous and colonial history through film, education, land and community.
Copyright of MLA
Magic Lands Alliance acknowledge the Traditional Owners, Custodians, and First Nations communities across Australia and internationally. We honour their enduring connection to the sky, land, waters, language, and culture. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and emerging, and to all First Peoples communities and language groups. This article draws only on publicly available information; many cultural practices remain the intellectual property of communities