Naming of Tasmania

The British Crown, Colonial Government, and the Naming of Tasmania

MLA Educational Series — History and Colonisation

The colonisation and naming of Tasmania reveal how British imperial authority shaped the lands now known as Australia. Once home to diverse and sovereign Aboriginal nations with rich languages and laws, the island was renamed and reorganised under the expanding rule of the British Crown. This article traces how Van Diemen’s Land, originally part of the colony of New South Wales, became known as Tasmania, and how that naming symbolised both the consolidation of colonial power and the endurance of Aboriginal resistance and identity.

The Crown and Imperial Authority

When the British Crown claimed sovereignty over Australia in 1788, King George III ruled an empire seeking new territories for trade, penal expansion, and global influence. The Crown’s legal claim to the southern lands rested on the doctrine of terra nullius, which denied Aboriginal ownership and presence.
In 1803, under the authority of Governor Philip Gidley King of New South Wales, the British established a penal outpost at Risdon Cove on the island’s southeastern coast. This marked the beginning of colonisation in what the British called Van Diemen’s Land — named after Anthony van Diemen, the seventeenth-century Dutch Governor-General of Batavia (Jakarta), whose sponsored explorer Abel Tasman had charted the island’s coasts in 1642.

Although the Dutch never settled the island, their naming persisted in British usage, reinforcing European narratives of discovery and ownership.

The Colonial Office and Imperial Policy

Throughout the early nineteenth century, decisions affecting Van Diemen’s Land were made in London by the Colonial Office, under ministers such as Lord Bathurst and Lord Glenelg. The island was initially administered from Sydney as part of New South Wales, but its growing population of convicts, soldiers, and free settlers soon led to calls for local control.

In 1825, the island became a separate colony, with a Lieutenant-Governor acting as the direct representative of the Crown. This structure mirrored Britain’s global strategy of extending royal sovereignty through local administrations while maintaining central imperial oversight.

The Crown’s moral justification for colonisation emphasised “civilisation” and “Christianisation,” yet in practice, frontier expansion brought violence, displacement, and devastation to Aboriginal communities across lutruwita/Tasmania (Reynolds 1981; Ryan 2012).

Governors and Local Administration

Lieutenant-Governors such as William Sorell (1817–1824) and George Arthur (1824–1836) were central to enforcing Crown authority.

• Sorell sought to stabilise the colony after years of disorder and conflict between settlers and soldiers.

• Arthur imposed martial law against Aboriginal resistance during the 1820s and 1830s, declaring the Black War — a period of frontier conflict that resulted in the near-annihilation of many Tasmanian nations (Ryan 2012).

Arthur also developed a network of penal settlements such as Port Arthur, embedding the Crown’s power through discipline and surveillance. His administration portrayed Aboriginal resistance as rebellion against lawful authority, ignoring that British sovereignty had been imposed without consent or treaty.

The Naming of Tasmania

For nearly two centuries, the island bore the name Van Diemen’s Land, evoking its penal origins and Dutch associations. By the 1840s, however, settlers and colonial leaders sought to distance themselves from the stigma of transportation. As transportation ended (officially in 1853), calls grew to rename the colony in honour of the Dutch navigator Abel Tasman, whose name was considered both dignified and geographically distinctive.

In 1856, with the granting of responsible self-government, the colony was officially renamed Tasmania. The new name symbolised a shift from penal colony to self-governing society, aligning with broader imperial trends of “respectable” colonial identity. Yet it also reinforced the European act of naming — overwriting thousands of Aboriginal place-names such as lutruwita, trawtha makuminya, and takayna, each carrying millennia of cultural meaning.

Aboriginal Sovereignty and Resistance

Across the island, Aboriginal nations resisted colonisation with extraordinary resilience. Leaders such as Mannalargenna, Tongerlongeter, and Walyer fought to defend their lands, families, and law. Despite overwhelming military force, they maintained diplomacy, intelligence networks, and spiritual connection to Country.

In 1831, George Augustus Robinson undertook a series of so-called “conciliation” missions on behalf of the colonial government. While framed as humanitarian, these expeditions led to the forced relocation of surviving Aboriginal peoples to Wybalenna, on Flinders Island, where many died from disease and despair.

Aboriginal voices, however, never disappeared. Descendants and Elders continued to assert identity and connection to lutruwita, rejecting colonial renaming and affirming that sovereignty was never ceded (Mansell 2019).

Symbolism of Naming and Imperial Power

The renaming of Van Diemen’s Land to Tasmania reflected both political rebranding and deeper imperial symbolism. To the British Crown, it marked progress from punishment to civilisation; to settlers, it represented moral renewal; to Aboriginal peoples, it epitomised the ongoing erasure of their lands, languages, and authority.

Every colonial name carried power — embedding European histories over ancient geographies. Yet Indigenous languages persist, and many Tasmanian communities today reclaim traditional names and stories, restoring the island’s true identity as lutruwita, the Country of their ancestors.

Conclusion

The naming of Tasmania reveals the layered history of colonisation, symbolism, and resistance. The British Crown and its administrators imposed royal sovereignty through proclamations, penal colonies, and names. Yet beneath the veneer of empire, Aboriginal sovereignty and belonging to Country endured.

To know Tasmania only by its colonial name is to hear only part of its story. To remember lutruwita is to recognise that Country speaks through older languages — voices that continue to restore balance and truth to the island’s history.

References

Belich, J. (2009). Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the Anglo-World, 1783–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Broome, R. (2005). Aboriginal Victorians: A History Since 1800. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Mansell, M. (2019). Tasmania’s Secret War. Hobart: Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre.
Reynolds, H. (1981). The Other Side of the Frontier: Aboriginal Resistance to the European Invasion of Australia. Ringwood: Penguin.
Robson, L. (1983). A History of Tasmania, Volume 1: Van Diemen’s Land from the Earliest Times to 1855. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Ryan, L. (2012). Tasmanian Aborigines: A History Since 1803. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Shaw

Written, Researched and Directed by James Vegter (22 September 2025)

MLA

Sharing the truth of Indigenous and colonial history through film, education, land, and community.
www.magiclandsalliance.org

Copyright MLA – 2025

Magic Lands Alliance acknowledges the Traditional Owners, Custodians, and First Nations communities across Australia and internationally. We honour their enduring connection to the sky, land, waters, language, and culture. We pay respect to Elders past, present, and emerging, and to all First Peoples’ communities and language groups. This article draws only on publicly available information; many cultural practices remain the intellectual property of their respective communities.